Youube on a mobile device. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
From TV to YouTube, the Oscars’ global shift reveals how entertainment, access and platforms are reshaping cultural institutions.
Updated
December 19, 2025 9:02 PM
Youube on a mobile device. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
The Oscars are moving to YouTube. Beginning in 2029, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has signed a multi-year agreement that makes YouTube the exclusive global home of the Oscars through 2033. From the ceremony itself to red carpet coverage, behind-the-scenes access and the Governors Ball, the entire experience will live on a platform most people already open every day.
On the surface, it looks like a distribution shift. In reality, it signals a broader strategic reset. For decades, television delivered scale for cultural institutions. Today, reach and discovery live on platforms, not channels. By choosing YouTube, the Academy is quietly acknowledging that cultural relevance today is built where audiences already are. In that context, YouTube is no longer just a place to watch clips but an emerging piece of cultural infrastructure.
What also stands out is how the Oscars are being reframed. This partnership is not limited to one night a year. Alongside the ceremony, YouTube will host year-round Academy programming through the Oscars YouTube channel. That includes nominations announcements, the Governors Awards, the Student Academy Awards, the Scientific and Technical Awards, filmmaker interviews, podcasts and education programs. Instead of a single broadcast moment, the Oscars are turning into an always-on ecosystem.
Accessibility is another central pillar of the deal. The Oscars will be free to watch globally, supported by closed captioning and audio tracks in multiple languages. This is less about nice-to-have features and more about staying relevant in a global, digital-first world. Younger audiences and viewers outside traditional Western markets expect access by default. The Academy is clearly building with that expectation in mind.
There is also a deeper exchange happening between heritage and technology. YouTube gains cultural weight by hosting one of the world’s most established creative institutions. The Academy, in turn, gains technological legitimacy and a clearer path into the future.
That balance extends to how the transition is being handled. The Academy’s domestic broadcast partnership with Disney ABC will continue through the 100th Oscars in 2028 and the international arrangement with Disney’s Buena Vista International remains in place until then. This is not an abrupt break from legacy media but a carefully phased shift. Change is being managed without burning bridges.
“We are thrilled to enter into a multifaceted global partnership with YouTube to be the future home of the Oscars and our year-round Academy programming,” said Academy CEO Bill Kramer and Academy President Lynette Howell Taylor. “The Academy is an international organization and this partnership will allow us to expand access to the work of the Academy to the largest worldwide audience possible — which will be beneficial for our Academy members and the film community. This collaboration will leverage YouTube’s vast reach and infuse the Oscars and other Academy programming with innovative opportunities for engagement while honoring our legacy. We will be able to celebrate cinema, inspire new generations of filmmakers and provide access to our film history on an unprecedented global scale.”
From YouTube’s side, the partnership places the platform firmly in the center of global cultural moments. “The Oscars are one of our essential cultural institutions, honoring excellence in storytelling and artistry,” said Neal Mohan, CEO, YouTube. “Partnering with the Academy to bring this celebration of art and entertainment to viewers all over the world will inspire a new generation of creativity and film lovers while staying true to the Oscars’ storied legacy.”
Google Arts & Culture extends the partnership beyond the ceremony. Select Academy Museum exhibitions and materials from the Academy’s 52-million-item collection will be made digitally accessible worldwide, bringing film history and education onto the same platform.
Taken together, the deal is less about where the Oscars will stream and more about how cultural institutions are adapting to the changing landscape. The Academy is positioning itself to be present year-round, globally accessible and aligned with the platforms that shape everyday viewing.
Keep Reading
HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.
Updated
November 28, 2025 4:18 PM
.jpg)
The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.
Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.
Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.
But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.
Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.
Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.
As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.
Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.
Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.