Deep Tech

The Robot Anxiety Gap: Why Countries With Fewer Robots Fear Them More

A global survey shows robot anxiety drops when people encounter robots in real life

Updated

March 13, 2026 2:25 PM

Ameca the humanoid robot, featuring a grey rubber face. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK

People often assume robots make people uneasy everywhere. But a new global study suggests something more nuanced. Robot anxiety tends to be highest in places where people rarely see robots in real life. Where robots are more visible, attitudes are often far more positive. That insight comes from a global study by Hexagon AB, which surveyed 18,000 participants across nine major markets. The research explored how adults and children think about robots and how those views change depending on everyday exposure.

In the United Kingdom, anxiety about robots is the highest among the countries studied. Around 52% of adults say they feel worried that something might go wrong when they think about interacting with or working alongside robots. South Korea sits at the other end of the spectrum, with only 29% reporting similar concerns. One factor appears to explain much of the gap: familiarity.

British adults are among the least likely to have encountered robots in real life. Only about 30% say they have seen or used one. In contrast, countries where robots are more visible tend to report greater comfort. China offers the clearest example. Around 75% of adults there say they have seen or interacted with robots. At the same time, 81% say they feel excited about the technology’s future potential.

The study suggests that attitudes toward robots are not fixed. Instead, they shift depending on where people encounter them and what tasks they perform. When robots are seen solving clear, practical problems, confidence tends to rise.

Across the surveyed countries, adults report the highest comfort levels with robots working in factories and warehouses. Around 63% say they are comfortable with robots in those environments. These are settings where tasks are clearly defined and safety standards are well understood. Acceptance drops in more personal spaces. Only 46% say they feel comfortable with robots in the home, while comfort falls further to 39% when robots are imagined in classrooms.

In other words, context matters. People appear more willing to accept robots when they take on physically demanding or dangerous work. Half of the respondents say improved safety is one of the main advantages of robotics in those environments. A similar share point to productivity gains as another benefit. Another finding challenges a common assumption about public fears. Job loss is often described as the biggest concern surrounding robotics. But the study suggests security risk worries people more.

Around 51% of adults say their biggest concern about robots at work is the possibility that the machines could be hacked or misused. That fear outweighs worries about physical malfunction or injury, which stand at 41%. Concerns about being replaced at work appear at the same level.

For many respondents, the issue is not simply whether robots can perform tasks. It is whether the systems controlling them are secure. According to researchers involved in the study, these concerns reflect how people evaluate emerging technologies. Instead of having a single opinion about robotics, people tend to judge each situation individually.

A robot helping assemble products in a factory may feel acceptable. The same technology operating in more sensitive environments can raise different questions. Dr. Jim Everett, an associate professor in moral psychology, says trust in artificial intelligence and robotics is often misunderstood. People are not simply asking whether they trust the technology, he notes. They are thinking about specific tools performing specific roles.

A robot assisting in a classroom or helping in healthcare carries different expectations than an AI system used in defense or surveillance. Even though these technologies are often grouped together in public debates, people evaluate them differently depending on their purpose.

Finally, the study also highlights another important factor shaping public attitudes: experience. When people actually encounter robots, fear often declines. Michael Szollosy, a robotics researcher involved in the project, says reactions tend to change quickly when individuals meet a robot for the first time.

The idea of an autonomous machine can feel intimidating in theory. But when people see a small service robot or an industrial machine performing a straightforward task, the reaction is often much calmer. Exposure can shift perceptions from abstract fears to practical understanding.

That shift matters because robotics is moving steadily into everyday environments. From manufacturing and logistics to healthcare and public services, machines capable of autonomous or semi-autonomous work are becoming more common.

As that happens, the study suggests public confidence may depend less on technical breakthroughs and more on visibility and transparency. Burkhard Boeckem, chief technology officer at Hexagon AB, argues that trust grows when people understand what robots are designed to do and where their limits lie.

Anxiety tends to increase when systems feel invisible or poorly understood. Clear boundaries and clear explanations can have the opposite effect. When people see robots working safely alongside humans, performing well-defined tasks and operating within clear rules, the technology becomes easier to accept.

In that sense, the future of robotics may depend as much on public familiarity as on engineering. The machines themselves are advancing quickly. But the relationship between humans and robots is still being negotiated. For now, the study offers a simple insight: the more people encounter robots in everyday life, the less mysterious they become. And once the mystery fades, the conversation often changes from fear to curiosity.

Keep Reading

Market Trends

5 Women’s Day Marketing Campaigns Startups Can Learn From

Skip the slogans—real Women’s Day campaigns create impact that lasts

Updated

March 6, 2026 1:23 AM

Mother Armenia monument in Victory Park, Gyumri city, Armenia. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK

Women’s Day offers brands an opportunity to show what they stand for through meaningful action. But the strongest International Women’s Day campaigns do more than say “thank you”. They speak to women’s everyday lives.

Instead of big, vague empowerment slogans, some brands focus on small moments that shape confidence and wellbeing. Think about how we compliment young girls, how safe public spaces feel, what comfort really looks like and how friendship plays help women grow. When a campaign is built on a real insight and backed by something practical, it lands harder and lasts longer.

If you’re a startup planning a Women’s Day initiative, there’s value in studying what actually works. The examples below show how clarity, credibility and usefulness can turn International Women’s Day into something that feels meaningful and on-brand.

1. Dove’s #ChangeTheCompliment campaign: Reframing everyday praise

To celebrate the International Day of the Girl on October 11, 2025, Dove launched #ChangeTheCompliment—a campaign that asked parents and caregivers to rethink how they praise girls. Instead of defaulting to looks-based comments, Dove encouraged adults to acknowledge qualities like resilience, intelligence and determination alongside beauty.

The idea was grounded in data from Dove’s 2024 Real State of Beauty report, which found that more than 60% of girls feel pressure to be beautiful. Dove brought the message to life through a digital film showing parents broadening their praise in everyday moments.  

In Canada, the campaign expanded through a partnership with psychologist Dr. Vanessa Lapointe, who helped anchor #ChangeTheCompliment in expert insight. She linked the campaign’s core message to Dove’s long-running Self-Esteem Project, launched in 2004 to provide free, evidence-based tools developed with psychologists and body image experts. Some of these tools included “Confident Me”, a classroom workshop on body confidence and “Amazing Me”, age-appropriate lessons designed to support self-esteem at school.  

What worked here is that it didn’t stay inside a brand video. Parents, teachers and creators joined in by sharing their own examples online, posting revised compliments, building quick classroom activities or filming short clips where they swapped appearance-based praise for character-based words. From social posts to simple at-home conversations, the idea travelled beyond the original film and made participation easy.

Startup takeaway: Don’t build a Women’s Day campaign around a fuzzy theme. Focus on specific, everyday behaviors your audience relates to and design your campaign to shift them. Specificity makes your message practical and memorable.

2. Tetley’s “I Am More Than My Nickname” campaign: Moving fitness beyond body size

In March 2024, Tetley Green Tea Immune launched the “I Am More Than My Nickname” campaign in India to challenge a common social habit: labeling someone’s fitness based on how their body looks. In many communities, body-type nicknames are used casually. Some of them might sound harmless, but they can chip away at confidence and self-worth over time. Tetley’s point was simple:  fitness isn’t a body size. It’s strength, health and well-being.

The campaign centered on a digital film featuring a young girl nicknamed “Golu”, a Hindi term often used to describe someone as chubby. Throughout the film, she’s judged before she even tries, with people deciding what she can and cannot do based on her appearance. As the story unfolds, she pushes back. The film closes with women of different body types holding placards displaying various nicknames, ending with a clear line: “My Body Can, Your Body Can, Every Body Can”. It’s a strong example of a brand taking a familiar social habit and giving people a new way to see it.

Startup takeaway: Look for one small, common behaviour your audience sees every day. Then give people a simple way to engage with it, whether that’s sharing a story, rethinking a phrase or calling out a habit. When participation is baked into the idea, the campaign spreads naturally.

3. L’Oréal Paris’ “Never Your Fault” campaign: Backing a bold message with expert partnership

For International Anti-Street Harassment Week 2025, L'Oréal Paris launched its “Never Your Fault” campaign as part of its Stand Up Against Street Harassment program. The campaign drew on L’Oréal Paris research with Ipsos showing the scale of the problem: 75% of women reported experiencing harassment, and 60% said they adjust their clothing or appearance in public.  

The message was clear: harassment is never the victim’s fault, and public spaces should feel safer for women. That matters because a lot of women still end up internalizing blame and changing how they dress just to lower the risk.  

The campaign also came with a clear next step. It builds on L’Oréal’s partnership with Right To Be, an international NGO focused on stopping harassment, which began in 2020. Through Right To Be’s 5D framework—Distract, Delegate, Document, Delay and Direct—the program teaches bystanders simple, practical ways to intervene safely in the moment.

Startup takeaway: If you’re addressing a sensitive issue in a Women’s Day campaign, don’t go about it alone. Work with experts who bring trust, depth and real tools. It makes your message stronger fast.

4. Van Heusen Innerwear’s Women’s Day poster: Redefining what “happy” means

In 2025, Van Heusen Innerwear marked Women’s Day with a single visual that many women immediately recognized. The poster showed a crumpled shirt with a bra placed over it, capturing that end-of-day moment of relief.  

The slogan on the poster—“Happy Women’s Day has nothing to do with us”—makes the point that real comfort is personal, not performative. The message wasn’t really about taking off a bra, but about the pressure women carry all day, including the expectation to look a certain way, feel a certain way and still keep going. By leaning into a real, everyday experience, Van Heusen positioned itself as a brand that listens rather than lectures.  

Startup takeaway: Skip the predictable in Women’s Day slogans. Find an honest, lived moment and build around it. When your campaign reflects real life, it feels relevant instead of seasonal.

5. Mattel’s International Women’s Day 2025 campaign: Celebrating friendship as a growth engine

In 2025, Mattel celebrated International Women’s Day by honoring real-life female friendship duos with one-of-a-kind Barbie Role Model dolls made in their likeness. The campaign focused on the idea that strong friendships help women grow, succeed and support each other. Instead of spotlighting individual achievement, it highlighted collective strength—women empowering women.

By featuring duos such as Alicia Keys and Ann Mincieli, Jordan Chiles and Jade Carey and other global pairs across sports, entertainment and advocacy, the campaign framed friendship as a source of confidence and ambition from girlhood onward. To make it practical, Mattel partnered with psychologist and best-selling author Dr. Marisa G. Franco, who shared simple advice for girls: take initiative in making friends, assume people will like you, express appreciation openly, try new activities together and prioritize quality over quantity in relationships.

Startup takeaway:  If your Women’s Day campaign is built on a social insight, make it actionable. Storytelling helps, but tools, education and frameworks are what make it useful.

Make your Women’s Day campaign matter

Across these International Women’s Day campaigns, the playbook is consistent: choose one real, everyday behaviour and shift it. Whether it’s the way we compliment girls, the labels we use, how bystanders intervene, what comfort feels like or how we nurture friendships, each brand anchored its message in something tangible and built action around it.

For startups, the lesson is straightforward: be precise in what you’re addressing, be credible in how you show up and make your message usable. Attention is easy to grab, but relevance is harder to earn and far more valuable.