AI’s expansion into the physical world is reshaping what investors choose to back
Updated
February 12, 2026 1:21 PM
Exterior view of the Exchange Square in Central, Hong Kong. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Artificial intelligence is often discussed in terms of large models trained in distant data centres. Less visible, but increasingly consequential, is the layer of computing that enables machines to interpret and respond to the physical world in real-time. As AI systems move from abstract software into vehicles, cameras and factory equipment, the chips that power on-device decision-making are becoming strategic assets in their own right.
It is within this shift that Axera, a Shanghai-based semiconductor company, began trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on February 10 under the ticker symbol 00600.HK. The company priced its shares at HK$28.2, debuting with a market capitalization of approximately HK$16.6 billion. Its listing marks the first time a Chinese company focused primarily on AI perception and edge inference chips has gone public in the city — a milestone that underscores growing investor interest in the hardware layer of artificial intelligence.
The listing comes at a time when demand for flexible, on-device intelligence is expanding. As manufacturers, automakers and infrastructure operators integrate AI into physical systems, the need for specialized processors capable of handling visual and sensor data efficiently has grown. At the same time, China’s domestic semiconductor industry has faced increasing pressure to build local capabilities across the chip value chain. Companies such as Axera sit at the intersection of these dynamics, serving both commercial markets and broader industrial policy priorities.
For Hong Kong, the debut adds to a cohort of technology companies seeking public capital to scale hardware-intensive businesses. Unlike software firms, semiconductor designers operate in a capital-intensive environment shaped by supply chains, fabrication partnerships and rapid product cycles. Their presence on the exchange reflects a maturing investor appetite for AI infrastructure, not just consumer-facing applications.
Axera’s early backer, Qiming Venture Partners, led the company’s pre-A financing round in 2020 and continued to participate in subsequent rounds. Prior to the IPO, it held more than 6 percent of the company, making it the second-largest institutional investor. The public offering provides liquidity for early investors and new funding for a company operating in a highly competitive and technologically demanding sector.
Axera’s market debut does not resolve the competitive challenges of the semiconductor industry, where innovation cycles are short and global competition is intense. But it does signal that investors are placing tangible value on the hardware, enabling AI’s expansion beyond the cloud. In that sense, the listing represents more than a corporate milestone; it reflects a broader transition in how artificial intelligence is built, deployed and financed — moving steadily from software abstraction toward the silicon that makes real-world autonomy possible.
Keep Reading
HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:33 PM
.jpg)
The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.
Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.
Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.
But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.
Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.
Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.
As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.
Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.
Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.