A Massachusetts startup advances scalable light-control tech for AR, AI and imaging markets
Updated
February 27, 2026 3:59 PM
Myrias Optics' Nanoimprinted All-inorganic Metaoptic. PHOTO: MYRIAS OPTICS
Myrias Optics, a Massachusetts-based optical technology startup, has raised US$2.1 million in a Seed 1 financing round to accelerate the commercialization of its advanced light-control technology. The round was led by MassVentures, with participation from existing investors Hoss Investment Inc., Maroon Venture Partners and Tenon Venture Partners, as well as new investors Mill Town Capital, TiE Boston Angels and Doug Crane. This new round follows a US$3.3 million seed financing completed in December 2023, led by Asia Optical, and a US$1.5 million Direct-to-Phase II award from the National Science Foundation. In total, Myrias has secured US$6.9 million to date, positioning it to move from development to scaled production.
The company builds ultra-thin, nano-patterned surfaces that precisely control how light moves through a device. These structures replace or enhance traditional lenses and optical parts inside products such as augmented reality headsets, AI data center hardware, consumer electronics, industrial systems and medical imaging devices. The goal is straightforward: to deliver high optical performance while making the parts easier and more cost-effective to manufacture in large quantities.
Across industries such as augmented reality and AI infrastructure, manufacturers face a common challenge. They need highly precise light-guiding components that can withstand heat and long-term use. At the same time, those components must be produced consistently and at scale. Traditional semiconductor-style fabrication can be costly, while polymer-based optical manufacturing can face limits in durability and thermal stability.
Myrias addresses this gap by using inorganic materials and a nanoimprint manufacturing process to create stable, repeatable optical layers on wafers. This approach is designed to combine performance with manufacturability. In augmented reality systems, for example, the company’s technology enables higher viewing angles while remaining suitable for volume production. In AI data centers, the same material and process advantages support improved light transfer and stronger performance under demanding thermal conditions. These benefits also extend to advanced imaging systems in consumer, industrial and medical markets.
The new Seed 1 funding is intended to expand manufacturing capacity and scale pilot production lines. The company will also continue executing active customer programs. Myrias is already working with strategic partners and Tier 1 supply chain participants to integrate its waveguide and light-shaping solutions into commercial AR platforms, AI photonics systems and advanced imaging products. The capital, therefore, supports a clear next step: moving from validated prototypes to a steady commercial supply.
Keep Reading
HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:33 PM
.jpg)
The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.
Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.
Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.
But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.
Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.
Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.
As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.
Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.
Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.