Closeup of the Ray-Ban logo and the built-in ultra-wide 12 MP camera on a pair of new Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer smart glasses. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
At under US$1,000, Hypernova isn’t just eyewear—it’s Meta’s push to make AR feel ordinary.
Updated
November 27, 2025 3:26 PM
Closeup of the Ray-Ban logo and the built-in ultra-wide 12 MP camera on a pair of new Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer smart glasses. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
Meta is preparing to launch its next big wearable: the Hypernova smart glasses. Unlike earlier experiments like the Ray-Ban Stories, these new glasses promise more advanced features at a price point under US$1,000. With a launch set for September 17 at Meta’s annual Connect conference, the Hypernova is already drawing attention for blending design, technology and accessibility.
In this article, let’s take a closer look at Hypernova’s design, features, pricing and the challenges Meta faces as it tries to bring smart glasses into everyday life.
Meta’s earlier Ray-Ban glasses offered cameras and audio but no display. Hypernova changes that: The glasses will ship with a built-in micro-display, giving wearers quick access to maps, messages, notifications and even Meta’s AI assistant. It’s a step toward everyday AR that feels useful and natural, not experimental.
Perhaps most importantly, the price makes them attainable. While early estimates placed the cost above US$1,000, Meta has committed to a launch price of around US$800. That’s still premium, but it moves AR smart glasses into reach for more consumers.
Hypernova weighs about 70 grams, roughly 20 grams heavier than the Ray-Ban Meta models. The added weight likely comes from added components like the new display and extra sensors.
To keep the glasses stylish, Meta continues its partnership with EssilorLuxottica, the company behind Ray-Ban and Prada eyewear. Thicker frames—especially Prada’s designs—help hide the hardware like chips, microphones and batteries without making the glasses look oversized.
The glasses stick close to the classic Ray-Ban silhouette but feature slightly bulkier arms. On the left side, a touch-sensitive bar lets users control functions with taps and swipes. For example, a two-finger tap can trigger a photo or start video recording.
Hypernova introduces something the earlier Ray-Ban glasses never had: a display built right into the lens. In the bottom-right corner of the right lens, a small micro-screen uses waveguide optics to project a digital overlay with about a 20° field of view. This means you can glance at turn-by-turn directions, check a notification or quickly consult Meta’s AI assistant without pulling out your phone. It’s discreet, practical and a major step up from the older models, which were limited to capturing photos and videos, handling calls and playing music via speakers.
Alongside the glasses comes the Ceres wristband, a companion device powered by electromyography (EMG). The band picks up the tiny electrical signals in your wrist and fingers, translating them into commands. A pinch might let you select something, a wrist flick could scroll a page, and a swipe could move between screens. The idea is to avoid clunky buttons or having to talk to your glasses in public. Meta has also been experimenting with handwriting recognition through the band, though it’s not clear if that feature will be ready in time for launch.
Meta doesn’t just want Hypernova to be useful—it wants it to be fun. Code found in leaked firmware revealed a small game called Hypertrail. It looks to borrow ideas from the 1981 arcade shooter Galaga, letting wearers play a simple, retro-inspired game right through their glasses. It’s not the main attraction, but it shows Meta is trying to make Hypernova feel more like a playful everyday gadget rather than just a piece of serious tech.
Hypernova runs on a customized version of Android and pairs with smartphones through the Meta View app. Out of the box, it should support the basics: calls, music and message notifications. Leaks suggest several apps will come preinstalled, including Camera, Gallery, Maps, WhatsApp, Messenger and Meta AI. A Qualcomm processor powers the whole setup, helping it run smoothly while keeping energy demands reasonable.
Meta is also trying to bring in outside developers. In August 2025, CNBC reported that the company invited third-party developers—especially in generative AI—to build experimental apps for Hypernova and the Ceres wristband. The Meta Connect 2025 agenda even highlights sessions on a new smart glasses SDK and toolkit. The push shows Meta’s interest in making Hypernova more than just a device; it wants a broader platform with apps that go beyond its own first-party software.
During development, Hypernova was rumored to cost as much as US$1,400. By pricing it around US$800, Meta signals that it wants adoption more than profit. The company is keeping production limited (around 150,000 units), showing it sees this as a market test rather than a mass rollout. Still, the sub-US$1,000 price tag makes advanced AR far more accessible than before.
Despite its promise, Hypernova may still face hurdles. The Ceres wristband can struggle if worn loosely, and some testers have reported issues based on which arm it’s worn on or even when wearing long sleeves. In short, getting EMG input right for everyone will be critical.
Privacy is another major concern. In past experiments, researchers hacked Ray-Ban Meta glasses to run facial recognition, instantly identifying strangers and pulling personal info. Meta has added guidelines, like a recording indicator light, but critics argue these measures are too easy to ignore. Moreover, data captured by smart glasses can feed into AI training, raising questions about consent and surveillance.
The Meta Hypernova smart glasses mark a turning point in wearable tech. They’re lighter and more stylish than bulky AR headsets, while offering real-world features like navigation, messaging and hands-free control. At under US$1,000, they aim to make AR glasses more than a luxury gadget—they’re a step toward everyday use.
Whether Hypernova succeeds will depend on how well it balances style, usability and privacy. But one thing is clear: Meta is betting that always-on, glanceable AR can move from science fiction to daily life.
Keep Reading
The hidden cost of scaling AI: infrastructure, energy, and the push for liquid cooling.
Updated
December 16, 2025 3:43 PM
The inside of a data centre, with rows of server racks. PHOTO: FREEPIK
As artificial intelligence models grow larger and more demanding, the quiet pressure point isn’t the algorithms themselves—it’s the AI infrastructure that has to run them. Training and deploying modern AI models now requires enormous amounts of computing power, which creates a different kind of challenge: heat, energy use and space inside data centers. This is the context in which Supermicro and NVIDIA’s collaboration on AI infrastructure begins to matter.
Supermicro designs and builds large-scale computing systems for data centers. It has now expanded its support for NVIDIA’s Blackwell generation of AI chips with new liquid-cooled server platforms built around the NVIDIA HGX B300. The announcement isn’t just about faster hardware. It reflects a broader effort to rethink how AI data center infrastructure is built as facilities strain under rising power and cooling demands.
At a basic level, the systems are designed to pack more AI chips into less space while using less energy to keep them running. Instead of relying mainly on air cooling—fans, chillers and large amounts of electricity, these liquid-cooled AI servers circulate liquid directly across critical components. That approach removes heat more efficiently, allowing servers to run denser AI workloads without overheating or wasting energy.
Why does that matter outside a data center? Because AI doesn’t scale in isolation. As models become more complex, the cost of running them rises quickly, not just in hardware budgets, but in electricity use, water consumption and physical footprint. Traditional air-cooling methods are increasingly becoming a bottleneck, limiting how far AI systems can grow before energy and infrastructure costs spiral.
This is where the Supermicro–NVIDIA partnership fits in. NVIDIA supplies the computing engines—the Blackwell-based GPUs designed to handle massive AI workloads. Supermicro focuses on how those chips are deployed in the real world: how many GPUs can fit in a rack, how they are cooled, how quickly systems can be assembled and how reliably they can operate at scale in modern data centers. Together, the goal is to make high-density AI computing more practical, not just more powerful.
The new liquid-cooled designs are aimed at hyperscale data centers and so-called AI factories—facilities built specifically to train and run large AI models continuously. By increasing GPU density per rack and removing most of the heat through liquid cooling, these systems aim to ease a growing tension in the AI boom: the need for more computers without an equally dramatic rise in energy waste.
Just as important is speed. Large organizations don’t want to spend months stitching together custom AI infrastructure. Supermicro’s approach packages compute, networking and cooling into pre-validated data center building blocks that can be deployed faster. In a world where AI capabilities are advancing rapidly, time to deployment can matter as much as raw performance.
Stepping back, this development says less about one product launch and more about a shift in priorities across the AI industry. The next phase of AI growth isn’t only about smarter models—it’s about whether the physical infrastructure powering AI can scale responsibly. Efficiency, power use and sustainability are becoming as critical as speed.