The quiet infrastructure shift powering the next generation of data centers
Updated
January 30, 2026 11:42 AM
Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) port on a motherboard, coloured yellow. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Modern data centers operate on a simple yet fundamental principle: computers require the ability to share data extremely quickly. As AI and cloud systems grow, servers are no longer confined to a single rack. They are spread across many racks, sometimes across entire rooms. When that happens, moving data quickly and cleanly becomes harder.
Montage Technology, a Shanghai-based semiconductor company, builds the chips and connection systems that help servers exchange data without delays. This week, the company announced a new Active Electrical Cable (AEC) solution based on PCIe 6.x and CXL 3.x — two important standards used to connect CPUs, GPUs, network cards and storage inside modern data centers.
In simple terms, Montage’s new AEC product helps different parts of a data center “talk” to each other faster and more reliably, even when those parts are physically far apart.
As data centers grow to support AI and cloud workloads, their architecture is changing. Instead of everything sitting inside one rack, systems now stretch across multiple racks and even multiple rows. This creates a new problem: the longer the distance between machines, the harder it is to keep data signals clean and fast.
This is where Active Electrical Cables come in. Unlike regular copper cables, AECs include small electronic components inside the cable itself. These components strengthen and clean up the data signal as it travels, so information can move farther without getting distorted or delayed.
Montage’s solution uses its own retimer chip based on PCIe 6.x and CXL 3.x. A “retimer” refreshes the data signal so it arrives accurately at the other end. This allows servers, GPUs, storage devices and network cards to stay tightly connected even across longer distances inside large data centers.
The company also uses high-density cable designs and built-in monitoring tools so operators can track performance and fix issues faster. That makes large data centers easier to deploy and maintain.
According to Montage, the solution has already passed interoperability tests with CPUs, xPUs, PCIe switches and network cards. It has also been jointly developed with cable manufacturers in China and validated at the system level.
What makes this development important is not just speed. It is about scale. AI models, cloud services and real-time applications demand massive amounts of data to move continuously between machines. If that movement slows down, everything else slows with it.
By improving how machines connect across racks, Montage’s AEC solution supports the kind of infrastructure that next-generation AI and cloud systems depend on.
Looking ahead, the company plans to expand its high-speed interconnect products further, including work on PCIe 7.0 and Ethernet retimer technologies.
Quietly, in the background of every AI system and cloud service, there is a network of cables and chips doing the hard work of moving data. Montage’s latest launch focuses on making that hidden layer faster, cleaner and ready for the scale that modern computing now demands.
Keep Reading
HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:33 PM
.jpg)
The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.
Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.
Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.
But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.
Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.
Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.
As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.
Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.
Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.