AutoFlight’s five-tonne Matrix bets on heavy payloads and regional range to prove the case for electric flight
Updated
February 10, 2026 12:56 PM
A multiroter flying through a blue sky. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
The nascent industry of electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft has long been defined by a specific set of limitations: small payloads, short distances and a primary focus on urban air taxis. AutoFlight, a Chinese aviation startup, recently moved to shift that narrative by unveiling "Matrix," a five-tonne aircraft that represents a significant leap in scale for electric aviation.
In a demonstration at the company’s flight test center, the Matrix completed a full transition flight—the technically demanding process of switching from vertical lift-off to forward wing-born flight and back to a vertical landing. While small-scale drones and four-seat prototypes have become increasingly common, this marks the first time an electric aircraft of this mass has successfully executed the maneuver.
The sheer scale of the Matrix places it in a different category than the "flying cars" currently being tested for hops over city traffic. With a maximum takeoff weight of 5,700 kilograms (roughly 12,500 pounds), the aircraft has the footprint of a traditional regional turboprop, boasting a 20-meter wingspan. Its size allows for configurations that the industry has previously struggled to accommodate, including a ten-seat business class cabin or a cargo hold capable of carrying 1,500 kilograms of freight.
This increased capacity is more than just a feat of engineering; it is a direct attempt to solve the financial hurdles that have plagued the sector, specifically addressing the skepticism industry analysts have often expressed regarding the economic viability of smaller eVTOLs. These critics frequently cite the high cost of operation relative to the low passenger count as a barrier to entry.
AutoFlight’s founder and CEO, Tian Yu, suggested the Matrix is a direct response to those concerns. “Matrix is not just a rising star in the aviation industry, but also an ambitious disruptor,” Yu stated. “It will eliminate the industry perception that eVTOL = short-haul, low payload and reshape the rules of eVTOL routes. Through economies of scale, it significantly reduces transportation costs per seat-kilometer and per ton-kilometer, thus revolutionizing costs and driving profitability.”
To achieve this, the aircraft utilizes a "lift and cruise" configuration. In simple terms, this means the plane uses one set of dedicated rotors to lift it off the ground like a helicopter, but once it reaches a certain speed, it uses a separate propeller to fly forward like a traditional airplane, allowing the wings to provide the lift. This design is paired with a distinctive "triplane" layout—three layers of wings—and a six-arm structure to keep the massive frame stable.
These features allow the Matrix to serve a variety of roles. For the "low-altitude economy" being promoted by Chinese regulators, the startup is offering a pure electric model with a 250-kilometer range for regional hops, alongside a hybrid-electric version capable of traveling 1,500 kilometers. The latter version, equipped with a forward-opening door to fit standard air freight containers, targets a logistics sector still heavily reliant on carbon-intensive trucking.
However, the road to commercial flight remains a steep one. Despite the successful flight demonstration, AutoFlight faces the same formidable headwinds as its competitors, such as a complex global regulatory landscape and the rigorous demands of airworthiness certification. While the Matrix validates the company's high-power propulsion, moving from a test-center demonstration to a commercial fleet will require years of safety data.
Nevertheless, the debut of the Matrix signals a maturation of the startup’s ambitions. Having previously developed smaller models for autonomous logistics and urban mobility, AutoFlight is now betting that the future of electric flight isn't just in avoiding gridlock, but in hauling the weight of regional commerce. Whether the infrastructure and regulators are ready to accommodate a five-tonne electric disruptor remains the industry's unanswered question.
Keep Reading
A look at how motivation, not metrics, is becoming the real frontier in fitness tech
Updated
February 7, 2026 2:18 PM
A group of people running together. PHOTO: FREEPIK
Most running apps focus on measurement. Distance, pace, heart rate, badges. They record activity well, but struggle to help users maintain consistency over time. As a result, many people track diligently at first, then gradually disengage.
That drop-off has pushed developers to rethink what fitness technology is actually for. Instead of just documenting activity, some platforms are now trying to influence behaviour itself. Paceful, an AI-powered running platform developed by SportsTech startup xCREW, is part of that shift — not by adding more metrics, but by focusing on how people stay consistent. The platform is built on a simple behavioural insight: most people don’t stop exercising because they don’t care about health. They stop because routines are fragile. Miss a few days and the habit collapses. Technology that focuses only on performance metrics doesn’t solve that. Systems that reinforce consistency, belonging and feedback loops might.
Instead of treating running as a solo, data-driven task, Paceful is built around two ideas: behavioural incentives and social alignment. The system turns real-world running activity into tangible rewards and it uses AI to connect runners to people, clubs and challenges that fit how and where they actually run.
At the technical level, Paceful connects with existing fitness ecosystems. Users can import workout data from platforms like Apple Health and Strava rather than starting from scratch. Once inside the system, AI models analyse pace, frequency, location and participation patterns. That data is used to recommend running partners, clubs and group challenges that match each runner’s habits and context.
What makes this approach different is not the tracking itself, but what the platform does with the data it collects. Running distance and consistency become inputs for a reward system that offers physical-world incentives, such as gear, race entries or gift cards. The idea is to link effort to something concrete, rather than abstract. The company also built the system around community logic rather than individual competition. Even solo runners are placed into challenge formats designed to simulate the motivation of a group. In practice, that means users feel part of a shared structure even when running alone.
During a six-month beta phase in the US, xCREW tested Paceful with more than 4,000 running clubs and around 50,000 runners. According to the company, users increased their running frequency significantly and weekly retention remained unusually high for a fitness platform. One beta tester summed it up this way: “Strava just logs records, but Paceful rewards you for every run, which is a completely different motivation”.
The company has raised seed funding and plans to expand the platform beyond running, walking, trekking, cycling and swimming. Instead of asking how accurately technology can measure the body, platforms like Paceful are asking a different question: how technology might influence everyday behaviour. Not by adding more data, but by shaping the conditions around effort, feedback and social connection.
As AI becomes more common in consumer products, its real impact may depend less on how advanced the models are and more on what they are applied to. In this case, the focus isn’t speed or performance — it’s consistency. And whether systems like this can meaningfully support it over time.