A new safety layer aims to help robots sense people in real time without slowing production
Updated
February 13, 2026 10:44 AM

An industrial robot in a factory. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Algorized has raised US$13 million in a Series A round to advance its AI-powered safety and sensing technology for factories and warehouses. The California- and Switzerland-based robotics startup says the funding will help expand a system designed to transform how robots interact with people. The round was led by Run Ventures, with participation from the Amazon Industrial Innovation Fund and Acrobator Ventures, alongside continued backing from existing investors.
At its core, Algorized is building what it calls an intelligence layer for “physical AI” — industrial robots and autonomous machines that function in real-world settings such as factories and warehouses. While generative AI has transformed software and digital workflows, bringing AI into physical environments presents a different challenge. In these settings, machines must not only complete tasks efficiently but also move safely around human workers.
This is where a clear gap exists. Today, most industrial robots rely on camera-based monitoring systems or predefined safety zones. For instance, when a worker steps into a marked area near a robotic arm, the system is programmed to slow down or stop the machine completely. This approach reduces the risk of accidents. However, it also means production lines can pause frequently, even when there is no immediate danger. In high-speed manufacturing environments, those repeated slowdowns can add up to significant productivity losses.
Algorized’s technology is designed to reduce that trade-off between safety and efficiency. Instead of relying solely on cameras, the company utilizes wireless signals — including Ultra-Wideband (UWB), mmWave, and Wi-Fi — to detect movement and human presence. By analysing small changes in these radio signals, the system can detect motion and breathing patterns in a space. This helps machines determine where people are and how they are moving, even in conditions where cameras may struggle, such as poor lighting, dust or visual obstruction.
Importantly, this data is processed locally at the facility itself — not sent to a remote cloud server for analysis. In practical terms, this means decisions are made on-site, within milliseconds. Reducing this delay, or latency, allows robots to adjust their movements immediately instead of defaulting to a full stop. The aim is to create machines that can respond smoothly and continuously, rather than reacting in a binary stop-or-go manner.
With the new funding, Algorized plans to scale commercial deployments of its platform, known as the Predictive Safety Engine. The company will also invest in refining its intent-recognition models, which are designed to anticipate how humans are likely to move within a workspace. In parallel, it intends to expand its engineering and support teams across Europe and the United States. These efforts build on earlier public demonstrations and ongoing collaborations with manufacturing partners, particularly in the automotive and industrial sectors.
For investors, the appeal goes beyond safety compliance. As factories become more automated, even small improvements in uptime and workflow continuity can translate into meaningful financial gains. Because Algorized’s system works with existing wireless infrastructure, manufacturers may be able to upgrade machine awareness without overhauling their entire hardware setup.
More broadly, the company is addressing a structural limitation in industrial automation. Robotics has advanced rapidly in precision and power, yet human-robot collaboration is still governed by rigid safety systems that prioritise stopping over adapting. By combining wireless sensing with edge-based AI models, Algorized is attempting to give machines a more continuous awareness of their surroundings from the start.
Keep Reading
HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.
Updated
January 8, 2026 6:33 PM
.jpg)
The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.
Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.
Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.
But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.
Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.
Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.
As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.
Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.
Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.