Take charge of your finances with these top budget monitoring apps that make tracking spending simple, smart, and stress-free.
Updated
November 27, 2025 3:26 PM
.webp)
A phone next to a laptop, displaying a stock market app. PHOTO: UNSPLASH
Managing personal finances can feel overwhelming, especially with the countless expenses we juggle daily. Thankfully, budget monitoring apps are hereto save the day. These handy tools help you track your spending, set financial goals, and build better money habits—all from the convenience of your smartphone.
Whether you're saving for a vacation, paying off debt, or just trying to avoid those end-of-the-month surprises, budget tracker apps can provide clarity and control over your finances. Here are 5 budget monitoring apps that will keep your spending on track.
If simplicity is what you’re after, Monefy is the solution. Known for its highly intuitive interface, Monefy lets users track their spending with just a few taps. Unlike many budget apps that overwhelm you with features, Monefy focuses on the essentials, making it great for beginners or anyone looking for a straightforward way to manage their money.
Monefy is perfect for users who want a no-frills app to track spending or beginners just dipping their toes into budgeting.
Budgeting doesn’t have to feel like a chore, and Fortune City proves just that. This app gamifies your financial habits by turning expense tracking into a city-building game. Every category of spending contributes to your virtual city’s development, making it an enjoyable way to visualize where your money is going.
Fortune City is ideal for those who find traditional budgeting boring or intimidating and want a fun way to stay consistent.
Jupiter combines the best of both worlds: digital banking and budgeting. This app integrates directly with your bank account, automatically categorizing transactions and providing insights into your spending patterns. It’s not just a budget tracker—it’s a full-fledged financial assistant.
Jupiter is best for users who want a hands-off budgeting experience and prefer an all-in-one app for banking and money management.
Inspired by the envelope budgeting method, GoodBudget offers a digital twist on this classic approach. Instead of physical envelopes, you allocate your money into virtual "envelopes" for different spending categories. This app encourages disciplined spending and is particularly effective for budgeters who like to plan ahead.
GoodBudget is ideal for planners who like a structured approach to budgeting and don’t mind manual tracking.
Wally is a feature-packed app designed for users who want deep insights into their spending habits. Its sleek design, multi-currency support, and detailed financial reports make it a standout option, especially for frequent travelers or professionals juggling multiple accounts.
Wally is perfect for users who want advanced budgeting tools and detailed insights, especially those with international financial needs.
Budget monitoring apps are powerful tools that simplify the often-daunting task of managing your finances. Whether you’re drawn to the playful gamification of Fortune City, the structured approach of GoodBudget, or the all-in-one convenience of Jupiter, there’s an app tailored to your preferences and goals.
These apps don’t just track your spending—they help you build better habits, gain financial clarity, and take control of your money. With the right app in your pocket, managing your budget becomes less of a chore and more of are warding journey toward financial freedom. So why wait? Choose an app, start tracking, and watch your financial confidence grow!
Keep Reading
HKU professor apologizes after PhD student’s AI-assisted paper cites fabricated sources.
Updated
November 28, 2025 4:18 PM
.jpg)
The University of Hong Kong in Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong Island. PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK
It’s no surprise that artificial intelligence, while remarkably capable, can also go astray—spinning convincing but entirely fabricated narratives. From politics to academia, AI’s “hallucinations” have repeatedly shown how powerful technology can go off-script when left unchecked.
Take Grok-2, for instance. In July 2024, the chatbot misled users about ballot deadlines in several U.S. states, just days after President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid against former President Donald Trump. A year earlier, a U.S. lawyer found himself in court for relying on ChatGPT to draft a legal brief—only to discover that the AI tool had invented entire cases, citations and judicial opinions. And now, the academic world has its own cautionary tale.
Recently, a journal paper from the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong was found to contain fabricated citations—sources apparently created by AI. The paper, titled “Forty Years of Fertility Transition in Hong Kong,” analyzed the decline in Hong Kong’s fertility rate over the past four decades. Authored by doctoral student Yiming Bai, along with Yip Siu-fai, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and other university officials, the study identified falling marriage rates as a key driver behind the city’s shrinking birth rate. The authors recommended structural reforms to make Hong Kong’s social and work environment more family-friendly.
But the credibility of the paper came into question when inconsistencies surfaced among its references. Out of 61 cited works, some included DOI (Digital Object Identifier) links that led to dead ends, displaying “DOI Not Found.” Others claimed to originate from academic journals, yet searches yielded no such publications.
Speaking to HK01, Yip acknowledged that his student had used AI tools to organize the citations but failed to verify the accuracy of the generated references. “As the corresponding author, I bear responsibility”, Yip said, apologizing for the damage caused to the University of Hong Kong and the journal’s reputation. He clarified that the paper itself had undergone two rounds of verification and that its content was not fabricated—only the citations had been mishandled.
Yip has since contacted the journal’s editor, who accepted his explanation and agreed to re-upload a corrected version in the coming days. A formal notice addressing the issue will also be released. Yip said he would personally review each citation “piece by piece” to ensure no errors remain.
As for the student involved, Yip described her as a diligent and high-performing researcher who made an honest mistake in her first attempt at using AI for academic assistance. Rather than penalize her, Yip chose a more constructive approach, urging her to take a course on how to use AI tools responsibly in academic research.
Ultimately, in an age where generative AI can produce everything from essays to legal arguments, there are two lessons to take away from this episode. First, AI is a powerful assistant, but only that. The final judgment must always rest with us. No matter how seamless the output seems, cross-checking and verifying information remain essential. Second, as AI becomes integral to academic and professional life, institutions must equip students and employees with the skills to use it responsibly. Training and mentorship are no longer optional; they’re the foundation for using AI to enhance, not undermine, human work.
Because in this age of intelligent machines, staying relevant isn’t about replacing human judgment with AI, it’s about learning how to work alongside it.